COST Action CA23125 TETRA aims to create a European network to share information, facilitating technology and knowledge transfer between the academic and health sectors, related to cancer studies. TETRA also aims to establish the material formalism approach as a standardized and accepted method for the detection of cancer without the need for human intervention. The Action will explore novel approaches for studying the metamaterial properties of biological tissues to accurately identify healthy and cancerous areas.
Accordingly, the 2nd workshop in the frame of Working group 2, which coordinates the “Workshop on Metamaterial modelling”, is focused on dissemination of WG2 results in a community important for metamaterial Technologies, promotion for WG2, input for the metamaterial society. Three groups of people are brought together in this workshop: mathematicians who are studying homogenization in high contrast materials and who are contributing to a better understanding of the mathematics of metamaterials; physicists and engineers who are working on metamaterials and their applications; and numerical analysts who are interested in solving the macroscopic and microscopic equations governing the behavior of metamaterials. There are still a number of obstacles to overcome, including gaining a deeper comprehension of the new behaviors and uses that metamaterials can accomplish in real-world settings; investigating the theoretical possibilities of homogenization theory; and developing effective and precise numerical algorithms to solve partial differential equations in order to advance the field. WG1 meeting aims to conclude on the visualization of cancerous tissues using established and emerging imaging modalities. During the WG2 meeting methods for digitizing and homogenizing biological tissues will be discussed. It is planned to conclude on the best options that could be applied. WG3 will conclude on the optimal techniques for measuring the properties of biological tissues for optimization of metamaterial-based modelling.
COST is an intergovernmental framework for European Cooperation in Science and Technology established to initiate networking and coordination of nationally funded research activities on a European level. It facilitates bringing good scientists together under light strategic guidance based on networks, called COST Actions, centred around research projects in fields that are of interest to COST countries and cooperating countries.
Abstracts should have a maximum of 350 words (download the Abstract Template).
Contributors could apply for financial support (see financial support section).
The selection committee, composed of the Action Chair, the Vice Chair, the Grant Awarding coordinator, and the WG1, WG2 and WG3 leaders and co-leaders, will evaluate the applications within a month after the abstract submission deadline and will inform the successful evaluated applicants. The successful applicants will then receive an e-mail from the grant holder (Grant Letter Notification), stating the official approval of the reimbursement, the granted budget, and a payment request form which has to be completed after the completion of the Workshop.
If the amount of reimbursement by all applications within a call does not exceed the available budget, the applications are handled by the selection committee. If there are more applications than funding is available, the following procedure takes place.
-
1. A list of all applications (containing an informative summary) is distributed to all members of the selection committee in form of a table in which every evaluator can mark which applications he or she can evaluate according to their field of expertise.
-
2. To guarantee a fair and objective evaluation, an evaluator should have no affiliation with neither the home nor the host institution of the application in question.
-
3. All applications are evaluated by two members of the selection committee. The Grant Awarding coordinator distributes the proposals to the individual evaluators.
-
4. The criteria given in the table below shall be applied for evaluation. The first criterion (a) is assessed by the Grant Awarding coordinator prior to the evaluation process.
Criterion |
max. points |
a) Before any further criteria are considered |
|
Application is complete and fulfils all formal requirements |
pass/no pass |
The application will be ranked last if the applicant was granted in previous call |
pass/no pass |
b) Evaluation of the proposal |
|
Applicant from ITC country |
0 or 10 |
Applicant is ECI (or promotes gender balance) |
0 or 10 |
Impact on the career of the applicant |
15 |
Willingness to participate based on the motivation letter |
10 |
Willingness to make a presentation in the Workshop session |
10 |
CV of the applicant |
10 |
Relevance to the objectives of TETRA Action |
20 |
-
5. The evaluators report their evaluations to the Grant Awarding coordinator.
-
6. The Grant Awarding coordinator ranks all evaluations and then reports the final result to the selection committee to be discussed and accepted.
-
7. The applicants are informed about the decision reached.